WATTS v. OLIVER

No. 14-11-00637-CV.

396 S.W.3d 124 (2013)

Richard Mark WATTS, Appellant v. Ruth OLIVER, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

January 24, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Jake Lemkuil , Houston, for Appellant.

Sallee S. Smyth , Joel A. Nass , Houston, for Appellee.

Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices JAMISON and BUSBY.


OPINION

MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.

In this appeal from a final order in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship, appellant Richard Mark Watts complains that the trial court erred by: (1) limiting expert testimony relevant to the child's best interest; (2) failing to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law; (3) awarding Ruth attorney's fees when Richard's petition was not frivolous; (4) awarding Ruth advisory appellate attorney's fees; and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases