1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 393 S.W.3d
  5. 393 S.W.3d 372 (2012)
 

BUCKINGHAM v. McAFEE

No. 07-11-0350-CV.

393 S.W.3d 372 (2012)

Billie and Carolyn BUCKINGHAM and Britt and Tara Buckingham, Appellants v. Josh McAFEE and Shawn Scholl, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo, Panel C.

December 12, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas D. Farris , Blair Saylor Oscarsson , Liberty D. Lay , Peterson Farris Byrd & Parker, P.C., Amarillo, TX, G. Keith Davis , Attorney at Law, Wellington, TX, for Appellants.

Patrick S. Weir , W. Wade Arnold , Underwood, Wilson, Berry Stein & Johnson, P.C., Amarillo, TX, for Appellees.

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide if the trial court erred in declaring that appellants Billie and Carolyn Buckingham and Britt and Tara Buckingham (collectively "the Buckinghams") do not own a portion of the Red River riverbed claimed by Josh McAfee and Shawn Scholl (collectively "McAfee"). We conclude that it did not, after considering the arguments urged by them.

Background

Realty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases