BURRUSS v. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.

No. 05-10-01376-CV.

392 S.W.3d 759 (2012)

John F. BURRUSS, Appellant v. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

July 31, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Burruss, Plano, TX, pro se.

Allen L. Adkins , Lindsay B. Nickle , ALlen L. Adkins & Associates, P.C., Lubbock, TX, for Appellee.

Before Justices MORRIS, FRANCIS, and LANG-MIERS.


OPINION

Opinion By Justice LANG-MIERS.

Appellant John F. Burruss, appearing pro se, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of appellee Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. In five issues, Burruss argues that Citibank was not entitled to summary judgment because: (1) Citibank created a fact issue when the interest rates specified in its account agreements contradicted the interest rates actually charged on his account statements; (2) Citibank failed to offer evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases