1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 311 S.W.3d
  5. 311 S.W.3d 210 (2010)
 

MILO v. MARTIN

No. 09-09-00145-CV.

311 S.W.3d 210 (2010)

Walter MILO and Anthony Shelton, Appellants, v. Guy MARTIN, Sandy Martin, Bill Cochran, Jr., and Melvin Douglas, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Decided April 29, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reginald E. McKamie, Sr., The Law Offices of Reginald E. McKamie, Sr., P.C., Houston, for appellants.

John Paul Hopkins, Hopkins Law Firm, Conroe, for appellees.

Before GAULTNEY, KREGER, and HORTON, JJ.

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

We are asked to consider whether the trial court erred in granting the appellees' no-evidence motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, Walter Milo and Anthony Shelton, sued Guy Martin, Sandy Martin, Bill Cochran, Jr., and Melvin Douglas (collectively referred to as "The Watchdog") for actual and punitive damages related to The Watchdog's alleged publication on its website of several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases