BERNSTEIN v. THOMAS

No. 05-08-00531-CV.

298 S.W.3d 817 (2009)

Joshua BERNSTEIN and Jordana Bernstein, Appellants, v. Matthew THOMAS and Lindsay Thomas, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

October 13, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua Bernstein, Miller & Curtis LLP, Melvin H. Wolovits, Thad D. Spalding, Hermes Sargent Bates, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Appellant.

Eugene A. "Chip" Brooker, Jr., Heather Bailey New, Haynes & Boone, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Appellee.

Before Justices MORRIS, RICHTER, and LANG-MIERS.


OPINION

Opinion By Justice MORRIS.

This appeal follows a jury trial. Appellants Joshua and Jordana Bernstein present three issues challenging the jury's verdict in favor of Matthew and Lindsay Thomas on a claim under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The Bernsteins first contend the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict or grant their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because the evidence presented at trial negated the element...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases