OPINION
KEASLER, J., delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.
The court of appeals upheld the trial judge's refusal to grant Edward Esparza's motion for DNA testing. The court held that testing showing the presence of DNA not belonging to Esparza would not prove his innocence because (1) the victim reported having sex two days before the attack, and (2) there was overwhelming eye-witness testimony establishing Esparza's guilt.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.