CASCOTT, L.L.C. v. CITY OF ARLINGTON

Nos. 2-08-042-CV, 2-08-044-CV, 2-08-046-CV, 2-08-106-CV, 2-08-107-CV, 2-08-108-CV, 2-08-109-CV, 2-08-110-CV, 2-08-111-CV, 2-08-113-CV, 2-08-134-CV, 2-08-135-CV, 2-08-136-CV, 2-08-137-CV, 2-08-138-CV, 2-08-139-CV, 2-08-149-CV.

278 S.W.3d 523 (2009)

CASCOTT, L.L.C., Appellant v. CITY OF ARLINGTON, Appellee, Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Clyde L. Godfrey, Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, James A. Shoemaker, Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Walter Hugh Herrington, Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Charles W. Scott and Anita R. Scott, Appellants v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Charles W. Scott and Anita R. Scott, Appellants v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Clyde L. Godfrey, and Wayne Coble and Nancy Coble, Trustees of the Wayne and Nancy Coble Living Trust, Appellants v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Cascott, L.L.C., Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Walter Hugh Herrington, Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee, Walter Hugh Herrington, Appellant v. City of Arlington, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

February 19, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Heidenheimer, P.L.L.C., Mark heidenheimer, McKinney, TX, Cohen & Zwerner, L.L.P., Robert D. Cohen, David F. Swerner, Dallas, TX, for Appellants.

Thompson & Knight, Richard B. Phillips, Jr., Michael E. Schonberg, Dallas, TX, Goodman, Clark & Beckham, Toby R. Goodman, Arlington, TX, City Attorney's Office, Robert Ivan Bland, Arlington, TX, for Appellee.

Panel: CAYCE, C.J.; GARDNER and McCOY, JJ.


OPINION

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

In this consolidated appeal involving the City of Arlington's exercise of eminent domain to obtain land for a stadium venue project, seventeen property owners argue in a single issue that the trial court erred in granting a partial summary judgment that the City properly invoked its authority to condemn their properties. We affirm.

I. Background

In 2004...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases