1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 832 N.W.2d
  5. 832 N.W.2d 62 (2013)
 

HUTH v. BERESFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT #61-2

No. 26471.

832 N.W.2d 62 (2013)

2013 S.D. 39

Sheila HUTH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BERESFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT #61-2 and Board Of Education, Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided May 29, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne Plooster of South Dakota Education Association, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorney for plaintiff and appellant.

Thomas H. Frieberg of Frieberg, Nelson & Ask, LLP, Beresford, South Dakota, Attorney for defendants and appellees.

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Sheila Huth taught fifth grade in the Beresford School District. In the spring of 2011, the Beresford Board of Education voted not to renew her teaching contract for the upcoming school year as a part of a reduction-in-force (RIF). Huth appealed to the circuit court, which affirmed. We affirm because we conclude that the policy for reductions in force was governed by a 2010-2011 Negotiated Agreement (2010-2011 Agreement) and the policy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases