1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 809 N.W.2d
  5. 809 N.W.2d 844 (2012)
 

STATE v. DAHL

No. 26061.

809 N.W.2d 844 (2012)

2012 S.D. 8

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Robert Clarence DAHL, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided February 1, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marty J. Jackley , Attorney General, Frank Geaghan , Assistant Attorney General, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellee.

Richard A. Sommers , Justin M. Scott of Bantz, Gosch & Cremer, LLC, Aberdeen, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellant.

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Robert Dahl appeals his conviction for third-offense DUI, arguing that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the stop of his vehicle because the stop lacked reasonable suspicion. The arresting officer initiated the investigatory stop to determine whether Dahl violated the statute requiring a vehicle executing a right turn to be driven as closely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases