MUNDHENKE v. HOLM

No. 25236.

787 N.W.2d 302 (2010)

2010 SD 67

William MUNDHENKE, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Steven HOLM, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided August 11, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greg L. Peterson of Bantz, Gosch & Cremer, LLC, Aberdeen, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellee.

Richard L. Russman of Richardson, Wyly, Wise, Sauck & Hieb, LLP, Aberdeen, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellant.


GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] William Mundhenke (Mundhenke) filed a complaint seeking an accounting, dissociation, and dissolution of a business he claimed was operated as a partnership with Steve Holm (Holm). Holm denied the existence of a partnership and argued that Mundhenke's complaint was a request for legal relief for which a right to a jury trial existed, rather than a request for equitable relief for which there is no right to a jury trial. The circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases