STATE v. BRITTON

No. 24724.

772 N.W.2d 899 (2009)

2009 SD 75

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. William BRITTON, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided August 19, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence E. Long, Attorney General, John M. Strohman, Assistant Attorney General, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellee.

Ellery Grey of Rensch Law Office, APLC, Rapid City, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellant.


KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In 2004, the South Dakota Legislature mandated that police canine teams be certified and annually recertified before they can be used to assist in law enforcement. During a traffic stop, a drug detection dog, who had not been recertified, indicated the presence of an illegal substance in the stopped vehicle and a search uncovered 155 pounds of marijuana. After the driver's motion to suppress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases