1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 140 S.Ct.
  5. 140 S.Ct. 768 (2020)
 

INTEL CORP. INV. POLICY COMMITTEE v. SULYMA

No. 18-1116.

140 S.Ct. 768 (2020)

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, et al., Petitioners v. Christopher M. SULYMA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 26, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew W.H. Wessler , Jonathan E. Taylor , Gupta Wessler PLLC, Gregory Y. Porter , Bailey & Glasser LLP, R. Joseph Barton , Block & Leviton LLP, Washington, DC, Joseph A. Creitz , Creitz & Serebin LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

John J. Buckley, Jr. , Daniel F. Katz , Vidya Atre Mirmira , David Kurtzer-Ellenbogen , Juli Ann Lund , Tanya Abrams , Jyoti Jindal , Williams & Connolly LLP, Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. , Ginger D. Anders , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC, Jordan D. Segall , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

For U.S. Supreme Court briefs, See: 2019 WL 6210522 (Reply.Brief) 2019 WL 4192157 (Pet.Brief) 2019 WL 5446785 (Resp.Brief)

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requires plaintiffs with "actual knowledge" of an alleged fiduciary breach to file suit within three years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases