1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 139 S.Ct.
  5. 139 S.Ct. 2051 (2019)
 

PDR NETWORK, LLC v. CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC

No. 17-1705.

139 S.Ct. 2051 (2019)

PDR NETWORK, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC, INC.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 20, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carter G. Phillips , Washington, DC, for the petitioners.

Glenn L. Hara , Rolling Meadows, IL, for the respondent.

Rachel P. Kovner for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, in support of the respondent.

Jeffrey N. Rosenthal , Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Ana Tagvoryan , Blank Rome LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Carter G. Phillips , Counsel of Record, Kwaku A. Akowuah , Daniel J. Feith , Kurt A. Johnson , Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, for petitioners.

D. Christopher Hedges , David H. Carriger , Calwell Luce , Ditrapano PLLC, Charleston, WV, Glenn L. Hara , Anderson + Wanca, Rolling Meadows, IL, for respondent.

This case concerns two federal statutes, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (Telephone Act) and the Administrative Orders Review Act (Hobbs Act). The first statute generally makes it unlawful for any person to send an "unsolicited advertisement" by fax. 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C)....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases