1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 138 S.Ct.
  5. 138 S.Ct. 1800 (2018)
 

CHINA AGRITECH, INC. v. RESH

No. 17-432.

138 S.Ct. 1800 (2018)

584 U.S. 811

CHINA AGRITECH, INC., Petitioner, v. Michael H. RESH, et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 11, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth A. Aronson , Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

David C. Frederick , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Abby F. Rudzin , Anton Metlitsky , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY, Bradley N. Garcia , Jason Zarrow , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C., Seth Aronson , William K. Pao , Brittany Rogers , Michelle C. Leu , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Matthew M. Guiney , Wolf Haldenstein Adler , Freeman & Herz LLP, David A.P. Brower , Brower Piven , A Professional Corporation, New York, NY, Betsy C. Manifold , Wolf Haldenstein Adler , Freeman & Herz LLP, San Diego, CA, David C. Frederick , Jeremy S.B. Newman , Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Respondents William Schoenke, Heroca Holding, B.V., and Ninella Beheer, B.V.

This case concerns the tolling rule first stated in American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 94 S.Ct. 756, 38 L.Ed.2d 713 (1974). The Court held in American Pipe that the timely filing of a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases