MURPHY v. SMITH

No. 16-1067.

138 S.Ct. 784 (2018)

583 U.S. 220

Charles MURPHY, Petitioner v. Robert SMITH, et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 21, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart Banner , Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Brett E. Legner , Chicago, IL, for Respondents.

Fred A. Rowley, Jr. , Daniel B. Levin , Mark R. Yohalem , Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Fabian J. Rosati , Chicago, IL, Stuart Banner , UCLA School of Law, Supreme Court Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Lisa Madigan , Attorney General, State of Illinois, David L. Franklin , Solicitor General, Brett E. Legner , Deputy Solicitor General, Mary Ellen Margaret Welsh , Kaitlyn N. Chenevert , Sarah A. Hunger , Assistant Attorneys General, Chicago, IL, for Respondents.


This is a case about how much prevailing prisoners must pay their lawyers. When a prisoner wins a civil rights suit and the district court awards fees to the prisoner's attorney, a federal statute says that "a portion of the [prisoner's] judgment (not to exceed 25 percent) shall be applied to satisfy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases