FRANCHISE TAX BD. OF CALIFORNIA v. HYATT

No. 14-1175.

136 S.Ct. 1277 (2016)

194 L. Ed. 2d 431

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner v. Gilbert P. HYATT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 19, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul D. Clement , Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

H. Bartow Farr , Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Scott W. DePeel , Franchise Tax , Board of the State of California, Sacramento, CA, Pat Lundvall , Debbie Leonard , McDonald Carano , Wilson, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, Paul D. Clement , George W. Hicks, Jr. , Stephen V. Potenza , Michael D. Lieberman , Bancroft PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner.


In Nevada v. Hall, 440 U.S. 410, 99 S.Ct. 1182, 59 L.Ed.2d 416 (1979), this Court held that one State (here, Nevada) can open the doors of its courts to a private citizen's lawsuit against another State (here, California) without the other State's consent....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases