ARMOUR v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IND.

No. 11-161.

132 S.Ct. 2073 (2012)

182 L.Ed.2d 998

Christine ARMOUR, et al., Petitioners v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 4, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. Stancil , Washington, DC, for Petitioners.

Paul D. Clement , Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Ronald J. Waicukauski , Carol Nemeth Joven , Price, Waicukauski & Riley LLC, Indianapolis, IN, R. Davy Eaglesfield III , Indianapolis, IN, Roy T. Englert, Jr. , Counsel of Record, Mark T. Stancil , Daniel N. Lerman , Leif Overvold , Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioners.

Justin F. Roebel , Alexander P. Will , Office of Corporation Counsel, Indianapolis, IN, Paul D. Clement , Counsel of Record, George W. Hicks, Jr. , Jeffrey M. Harris , Bancroft PLLC, Washington, DC, for Respondents.


Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court.

For many years, an Indiana statute, the "Barrett Law," authorized Indiana's cities to impose upon benefited lot owners the cost of sewer improvement projects. The Law also permitted those lot owners to pay either immediately in the form of a lump sum or over time in installments. In 2005, the city of Indianapolis (City) adopted a new assessment and payment method, the "STEP" plan, and it forgave any Barrett Law installments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases