GONZALEZ v. THALER

No. 10-895.

132 S.Ct. 641 (2012)

181 L.Ed.2d 619

Rafael Arriaza GONZALEZ, Petitioner v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 10, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia A. Millett , Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Jonathan F. Mitchell , Solicitor General, Austin, TX, for Respondent.

Ann O'Connell , for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting the Respondent.

Amit Kurlekar , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, San Francisco, CA, John B. Capehart , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX, Patricia A. Millett , Counsel of Record, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, J. Carl Cecere , Hankinson Levinger LLP, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Greg Abbott , Attorney General of Texas, Daniel T. Hodge , First Assistant Attorney General, Don Clemmer , Deputy Attorney General for Criminal Justice, Edward L. Marshall , Chief, Postconviction Litigation Division, Jonathan F. Mitchell , Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, James P. Sullivan , Arthur C. D'Andrea , Assistant Solicitors General, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Respondent.


Justice SOTOMAYOR delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case interprets two provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The first, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), provides that a habeas petitioner must obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal a federal district court's final order in a habeas proceeding. § 2253(c)(1). The COA may issue only if the petitioner has made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases