ROSE v. SOUTH CAROLINA DPPPS

Opinion No. 27940.

429 S.C. 136 (2020)

838 S.E.2d 505

David ROSE, Petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Filed January 29, 2020.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Travis Dayhuff , of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan and Assistant General Counsel Tommy Evans Jr. , both of Columbia, for Respondent.


For years, the Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services (DPPPS) improperly denied inmates parole based on an incorrect interpretation of the statute setting forth the number of votes required by the parole board. Because DPPPS had a policy of destroying records of parole hearings, it was, to put it mildly, difficult...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases