1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 413 S.C.
  5. 413 S.C. 341 (2015)
 

JORDAN v. JUDY

No. 5334.

413 S.C. 341 (2015)

776 S.E.2d 96

Kay Howell JORDAN, Marion Howell Tolson, and Lewis Virgil Howell, Respondents, v. Betty L.S. JUDY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided July 22, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. McCurry, Jr. , of Horger Barnwell & Reid, LLP, of Orangeburg, and James B. Richardson, Jr. , of Columbia, for appellant.

Woodrow Grady Jordan , of Smith, Jordan and Lavery, P.A., of Easley, for respondents.

In this boundary dispute action, Betty L.S. Judy appeals the trial court's setting of the boundary line, contending it was arbitrary and the only reasonable inference was the boundary should be set where prior plats and surveys showed it. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases