RICHLAND COUNTY ASSESSOR v. HULL

No. 2014-MO-018.

408 S.C. 405 (2014)

759 S.E.2d 745

RICHLAND COUNTY ASSESSOR, Respondent, v. James M. HULL, d/b/a Hull Storey Gibson Companies, LLC, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided June 18, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy E. Madden , of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Greenville, and Matthew W. Matson , of Augusta, GA, for Appellant.

John M.S. Hoefer , of Willoughby & Hoefer, PA, of Columbia, and Malane S. Pike , of White Rock, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an administrative law court's (ALC) order finding the respondent correctly valued the appellant's land for property tax purposes. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:

1. Determination of property values: S.C.Code Ann. § 1-23-610(B) (Supp.2013) ("The Court may not substitute its judgment for the judgment of the [ALC] as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact."); S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases