1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 406 S.C.
  5. 406 S.C. 187 (2013)
 

AUSTIN v. STOKES-CRAVEN HOLDING CORP.

No. 27324.

406 S.C. 187 (2013)

750 S.E.2d 78

Donald C. AUSTIN, Respondent, v. STOKES-CRAVEN HOLDING CORP., d/b/a Stokes Craven Ford, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided October 23, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew K. Epting, Jr . and Michelle N. Endemann , both of Andrew K. Epting, Jr., LLC, of Charleston, for Appellant.

Brooks Roberts Fudenberg , of Mt. Pleasant, and C. Steven Moskos , of Charleston, for Respondent.

Justice BEATTY.

The resolution of this case involves an interpretation of a narrow portion of our opinion in Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp., 387 S.C. 22, 691 S.E.2d 135 (2010). Specifically, the consolidated appeals are the result of a dispute over the Court's holding concerning Donald C. Austin's entitlement to trial fees under the South Carolina Regulation of Manufacturers, Distributors...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases