WIDENHOUSE v. COLSON

No. 27294.

405 S.C. 55 (2013)

747 S.E.2d 188

Sue Taylor Colson WIDENHOUSE, Respondent, v. Tammy Batson COLSON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 7, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David D. Armstrong , of Armstrong Law Firm of Greenville, for Appellant.

Matthew D. Lincoln and Scott Michael Tyler , both of Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, of Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson , Deputy Solicitor General J. Emory Smith, Jr. , and Solicitor General Robert D. Cook , all of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae, State of South Carolina.


Justice PLEICONES.

This is an appeal from an order according full faith and credit to a North Carolina money judgment notwithstanding that the causes of action upon which the judgment was based have been abolished in South Carolina. We affirm.

Sue Taylor Colson Widenhouse (respondent) sued Tammy Batson Colson (appellant) in North Carolina state court for alienation of affections and criminal conversation. Judgment was entered for respondent in the sum of ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases