MARTIN v. BAY

No. 5035.

400 S.C. 140 (2012)

732 S.E.2d 667

David R. MARTIN and Patricia F. Martin, Respondents/Appellants, v. Ann P. BAY, Harvie Goddin, Tony L. Hannon and Diann F. Hannon, Defendants, Of whom Ann P. Bay and Harvie Goddin are, Appellants/Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided September 19, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Dana Sinkler , of Warren & Sinkler, L.L.P., of Charleston, for Appellants/Respondents Ann P. Bay and Harvie Goddin.

David R. Martin and Patricia F. Martin, pro se, of Edisto Island, for Respondents/Appellants.


LOCKEMY J.

In this direct appeal, Appellants/Respondents Ann P. Bay and Harvie Goddin argue the Master-In-Equity (Master) erred in admitting evidence to interpret the extent of the easement at issue when the Master had found the covenant language determining the boundaries of the easement was unambiguous. Further, Bay and Goddin contend the Master erred in taking judicial notice of the propensity of the critical line to migrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases