1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 394 S.C.
  5. 394 S.C. 154 (2011)
 

CAROLINA CHLORIDE v. RICHLAND COUNTY

No. 27013.

394 S.C. 154 (2011)

714 S.E.2d 869

CAROLINA CHLORIDE, INC., Respondent/Petitioner, v. RICHLAND COUNTY, a South Carolina Political Subdivision, Petitioner/Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided July 25, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew F. Lindemann , William H. Davidson, II , and Michael B. Wren , of Davidson & Lindemann, of Columbia, for Petitioner-Respondent.

Edward D. Sullivan , Christian Stegmaier , and Amy L. Neuschafer , of Collins & Lacy, of Columbia, for Respondent-Petitioner.

Justice BEATTY.

Carolina Chloride, Inc. brought this action against Richland County alleging the County incorrectly advised it of the legal zoning classification of its property and that it lost a potential sale of the property due to the zoning issue. The trial judge directed a verdict for the County on all of Carolina Chloride's claims. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded as to the claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, but upheld the directed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases