1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 392 S.C.
  5. 392 S.C. 143 (2011)
 

ROE v. REEVES

No. 26967.

392 S.C. 143 (2011)

708 S.E.2d 778

Jane ROE and John Roe, Appellants, v. Craig REEVES, Victoria A., John Doe, Biological Father and Baby Boy, an infant, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided May 2, 2011.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip J. Temple , Temple, Mann, Briggs & Hill, of Greenville, and Robert Norris Hill , Law Offices of Robert Hill, of Newberry, for Appellants.

Andrea B. Williams , of Greenville, and Mary Alice H. Godfrey , Godfrey Law Firm, of Greenville, for Respondents.

Katherine H. Tiffany , Guardian Ad Litem, of Carter Smith Merriam Rogers & Traxler, of Greenville.

Justice HEARN:

In this case, Craig Reeves (Father) claims his consent was necessary prior to another couple adopting his child. The family court agreed, finding that he met the requirements of Section 63-9-310(A)(5)(b) of the South Carolina Code (2010) and awarding him custody of the child. We find that Father did not undertake sufficient good faith efforts to assume parental responsibility and comply with section 63-9-310...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases