SINKLER v. COUNTY OF CHARLESTON

No. 26787.

387 S.C. 67 (2010)

690 S.E.2d 777

G. Dana SINKLER and Anchorage Plantation Home Owners Association, Petitioners, v. COUNTY OF CHARLESTON, Charleston County Council and Theodora Walpole and John D. Walpole, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided March 15, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Trenholm Walker, Francis M. Ervin, and Sara E. DeWolf, all of Pratt-Thomas & Walker, of Charleston, for Petitioners.

County Attorney Joseph Dawson, III, Deputy County Attorney Bernard E. Ferrara, Jr., Assistant County Attorney Austin A. Bruner, all of North Charleston; and Gerald M. Finkel, of Finkel Law Firm, of Charleston, for Respondents.


Justice BEATTY:

G. Dana Sinkler and Anchorage Plantation Home Owners Association (collectively, Petitioners) brought this action against the County of Charleston, Charleston County Council, and Theodora and John D. Walpole (collectively, Respondents) challenging an ordinance rezoning the Walpoles' property, Anchorage Plantation, from agricultural to a Planned Development (PD) district. Upon review, the circuit court ruled the ordinance was invalid and that the property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases