1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 385 S.C.
  5. 385 S.C. 550 (2009)
 

CAROLINA RENEWAL v. DEPT. OF TRANSP.

No. 4622.

385 S.C. 550 (2009)

684 S.E.2d 779

CAROLINA RENEWAL, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Daniel Shealy, Steve Gwinn, Robert Burriss, and David Figus, Defendants, Of Whom South Carolina Department of Transportation is the Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided October 8, 2009.

Rehearing Denied November 19, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Weston Hardee, of Columbia, for Appellant.

H. Ronald Stanley, of Columbia, for Respondent.

HEARN, C.J.

Carolina Renewal contends the trial court erred in determining its breach of contract claim was barred by collateral estoppel. We affirm.

FACTS

In 2002, Carolina Renewal entered into a contract with the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) to perform road construction in Spartanburg County. Shortly after work began, Robert Burriss, a SCDOT employee, made slanderous statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases