PITTSBURGH v. POLICE FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1

No. 2 WAP 2019.

224 A.3d 702 (2020)

CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Appellee, v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided: January 22, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Joseph Cimballa, Esq. , Richardson Todd Eagen, Esq. , Welby, Stoltenberg, Cimballa & Cook, LLC, Ronald Ryan Retsch, Esq. , for Appellant.

Kelly Mistick, Esq. , City of Pittsburgh Law Department, for Appellee.

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.


OPINION

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR

The appellant, a police bargaining unit proceeding on behalf of its members, seeks the benefit of a grievance arbitration award that was overturned by a statutory appeals court. The matter arises in the context of the special statutory provisions governing collective bargaining arrangements between police and firefighting personnel and their public employers, known as "Act 111."1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases