1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 200 A.3d
  5. 200 A.3d 58 (2019)
 

PITTSBURGH HISTORY FOUNDATION v. ZIEGLER

Nos. 53 WAP 2017, 54 WAP 2017.

200 A.3d 58 (2019)

PITTSBURGH HISTORY AND LANDMARKS FOUNDATION, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation; Landmarks Financial Corporation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation; Henry P. Hoffstot, Jr.; David E. Barensfeld; Peter H. Stephaich; Patrick R. Wallace; Alexander Speyer; and Henry P. Hoffstot, III v. Arthur P. ZIEGLER, Jr.; Mark S. Bibro; Jack R. Norris; Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation; and Landmarks Financial Corporation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation Appeal of: Arthur P. Ziegler Jr., Mark S. Bibro, Jack R. Norris, Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation and Landmarks Financial Corporation Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation; Landmarks Financial Corporation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation; Henry P. Hoffstot, Jr.; David E. Barensfeld; Peter H. Stephaich; Patrick R. Wallace; Alexander Speyer; and Henry P. Hoffstot, III v. Arthur P. Ziegler, Jr.; Mark S. Bibro; Jack R. Norris; Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation; and Landmarks Financial Corporation, a Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation Appeal of: Henry P. Hoffstot, Jr.; David E. Barensfeld; Peter H. Stephaich; Patrick R. Wallace; Alexander Speyer; and Henry P. Hoffstot, III

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided: January 23, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary P. Hunt , Jeremy Victor Farrell , Richard B. Tucker, III , Tucker Arensberg, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Arthur P. Ziegler, Jr., et al., Designated Appellant.

Walter P. DeForest, Pittsburgh, PA, pro se.

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.

OPINION

Before this Court are questions involving the applicability of the attorney-client privilege in a corporate derivative action lawsuit brought by former board members of two nonprofit corporations against current board members. As explained more fully herein, we respectfully reject, for purposes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases