COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Petitioner
v.
James EISEMAN, Jr. and the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Respondents.
Aetna Better Health, Inc., Health Partners of Philadelphia, Inc., and Keystone Mercy Health Plan, Petitioners
v.
James Eiseman, Jr., and the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Respondents.
UnitedHealthcare of Pennsylvania, Inc. D/B/A UnitedHealthcare Community Plan and HealthAmerica Pennsylvania Inc. D/B/A CoventryCares, Petitioners
v.
James Eiseman, Jr. and the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Respondents.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 9, 2013.
Decided February 19, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Christopher H. Casey and Erin C. Galbally , Philadelphia, for petitioners Health Partners of Philadelphia, Inc., Keystone Mercy Health Plan and Aetna Better Health Inc.
Leonard W. Crumb , Senior Assistant Counsel, Harrisburg, for petitioner Department of Public Welfare.
Karl S. Myers , Philadelphia, for petitioners HealthAmerica Pennsylvania, Inc., UnitedHealthcare of Pennsylvania, Inc., UnitedHealthcare Community Plan and ConventryCares.
BEFORE: DAN PELLEGRINI, President Judge, and BERNARD L. McGINLEY, Judge, and ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge, and MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, Judge, and P. KEVIN BROBSON, Judge, and PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge and ANNE E. COVEY, Judge.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.
This fact-intensive Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)1 petition for review from a final determination of the Office of Open Records (OOR) implicates rate-setting in the managed care industry.2 OOR ordered disclosure of rates set by contracts related to the Department of Public Welfare's (DPW) administration of the Medicaid program. DPW asserted the rates were exempt under the Pennsylvania Uniform...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
