COM. v. SPRUILL

No. 54 EAP 2011

80 A.3d 453 (2013)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Shonda SPRUILL, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 22, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh J. Burns Jr., Esq. , Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Karl Baker, Esq. , Mark Patrick Cichowicz, Esq. , Defender Association of Philadelphia, for Shonda Spruill.

CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, and STEVENS, JJ.


OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE1.

This appeal by the Commonwealth presents an issue concerning the proper scope of the "illegal sentence" doctrine, which allows for review of otherwise defaulted claims. The Superior Court held that the claim at issue, which concerned the propriety of appellee's conviction for the offense of aggravated assault, implicated the legality of appellee's sentence; found that the claim was meritorious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases