1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 78 A.3d
  5. 78 A.3d 21 (2013)
 

FRIMET v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW

No. 246 C.D. 2013.

78 A.3d 21 (2013)

Theodore R. FRIMET, Petitioner, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 4, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore R. Frimet, pro se.

Gerard M. Mackarevich , Deputy Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Christopher G. Giovanis , Assistant Counsel, Harrisburg, for intervenor Office of Unemployment Compensation Benefits.

BEFORE: PELLEGRINI, President Judge, SIMPSON, Judge, and McCULLOUGH, Judge.

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.

In this administrative agency appeal we must decide how the exhaustion of regular unemployment compensation (UC) benefits and allowances under the now-inactive Self-Employment Assistance (SEA) Program impacts eligibility for extended unemployment compensation benefits. There are few cases addressing this area, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) asserted in its decision that the answer to this question was not clear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases