1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 77 A.3d
  5. 77 A.3d 562 (2013)
 

COM. v. SMITH

No. 88 MAP 2011.

77 A.3d 562 (2013)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Daniel Roger SMITH, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided September 25, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen Ann Diaz, Esq. , Doylestown, Stephen B. Harris, Esq. , Warrington, David Ward Heckler, Esq. , Doylestown, Robert J. Salzer, Esq. , Bucks County District Attorney's Office, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

John J. Kerrigan Jr., Esq. , Langhorne, for Daniel Roger Smith.

BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ.

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We accepted allowance of appeal in this case to examine whether the Superior Court erred in determining that police officers, when seeking consent from an individual for the testing of his blood for the presence of drugs or alcohol following a traffic accident, must inform the individual that the results of the test may be used for criminal or prosecutorial purposes. To the extent the Superior Court held that an officer must...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases