1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 65 A.3d
  5. 65 A.3d 301 (2013)
 

KAROLY v. MANCUSO

No. 38 MAP 2012

65 A.3d 301 (2013)

John P. KAROLY, Jr., Appellant v. Michael MANCUSO, Esquire, Assistant District Attorney and Eric Kerchner, Detective and Christopher Jones, Esquire, Assistant District Attorney, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided April 24, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua Enders Karoly, Esq. , Karoly Lawfirm, L.L.C., for Appellant.

James V. Fareri, Esq. , Gerard Joseph Geiger, Esq. , Newman, Williams, Mishkin, Corveleyn, Wolfe & Fareri, P.C., for Appellee.

Before: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ.

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

In this direct appeal involving alleged intentional violations of the Wiretap Act, we consider whether the Commonwealth Court erred in granting a defense motion for summary judgment.

I. Background

Pennsylvania's Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act (the "Wiretap Act," or the "Act")1 is designed to protect individual privacy while also giving law enforcement authorities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases