1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 57 A.3d
  5. 57 A.3d 655 (2012)
 

QUALITY CARE v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

No. 58 C.D. 2012

57 A.3d 655 (2012)

QUALITY CARE OPTIONS, Petitioner v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided December 14, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wendy S. Smith , Philadelphia, for petitioner.

Maribeth Wilt-Seibert , Assistant Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: McGINLEY, Judge, and SIMPSON, Judge, and McCULLOUGH, Judge.

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.

The central issue in this unemployment compensation appeal is whether Jamal Mack (Claimant), who performed healthcare services to clients of Quality Care Options (Company), did so as an employee or as an independent contractor. The compensation authorities determined Claimant was an employee. On its appeal, Company questions whether the record supports the conclusion that Claimant was an employee. Upon review, we reverse.

I. Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases