ROETHLEIN v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES, LTD.

Nos. 502 & 503 EAL 2011.

53 A.3d 1317 (2012)

Beverly ROETHLEIN and Robert Albanese, on Behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated and Jerry Konidaris and Theodora G. Konidaris, Respondents v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES, LTD. and Michelle R. Portnoff, Esquire, Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

October 3, 2012.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issues, as stated by Petitioners:

a. Did the Commonwealth Court err as a matter of law in holding that Pennsylvania's usury statute, the Loan Interest and Protection Law (the "LIPL"), provides a cause of action to challenge costs charged in the collection of delinquent taxes and to impose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases