UMEDMAN v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BD.

No. 277 C.D. 2012

52 A.3d 558 (2012)

Elina UMEDMAN, Petitioner v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided September 13, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vladislav Tinovsky , Trevorse, for petitioner.

Teresa Heacock DeLeo , Assistant Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Thomas Klemm , Philadelphia, for intervenor New Hope Adult Day Care, LLC.

BEFORE: LEADBETTER, Judge, and COHN JUBELIRER, Judge, and COVEY, Judge.


OPINION BY Judge COVEY.

Elina Umedman (Umedman) petitions for review of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review's (UCBR) January 20, 2012 order reversing the Referee's order, thereby denying Umedman unemployment compensation (UC) benefits. There are essentially four issues for this Court's review: (1) whether the UCBR's decision was supported by substantial evidence; (2) whether the UCBR erred in failing to consider the City Health Department's unwritten "closure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases