1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 41 A.3d
  5. 41 A.3d 630 (2012)
 

PHILA. SUBURBAN DEV'T v. SCRANTON ZHB.

No. 815 C.D. 2011.

41 A.3d 630 (2012)

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT CORP., Appellant v. SCRANTON ZONING HEARING BOARD.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided April 5, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard S. Bishop , Kingston, for appellant.

Daniel L. Penetar, Jr. , Scranton, for appellee Scranton Zoning Hearing Board.

BEFORE: PELLEGRINI, Judge, and SIMPSON, Judge, and LEAVITT, Judge.

OPINION BY Judge LEAVITT.

Philadelphia Suburban Development Corporation (Developer) appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County (trial court) denying its application for an accessory use. In doing so, the trial court affirmed the decision of the Scranton Zoning Hearing Board (Board) that the creation of housing for pre-release inmates and parolees was not a use customary and incidental to an office use. Instead, the Board found that Developer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases