1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 33 A.3d
  5. 33 A.3d 601 (2011)
 

INGERMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING v. EDELSTEIN

No. 436 EAL 2011.

33 A.3d 601 (2011)

INGERMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC., the Ingerman Group, and Chatham Apartment Associates, L.P. by and through their Assignee, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Ingerman Construction Company, Inc. by and through its Assignee, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company in its Own Right, Petitioners v. Margolis EDELSTEIN and Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Transamerican Insurance Group and the Insurance Corporation of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 7, 2011.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a factual dispute to be determined by a jury that they were damaged by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein? (2) Did the Superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases