1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 32 A.3d
  5. 32 A.3d 850 (2011)
 

NAMANI v. W.C.A.B. (A. DUIE PYLE)

No. 552 C.D. 2011.

32 A.3d 850 (2011)

Hakif NAMANI, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (A. DUIE PYLE), Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided December 6, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart A. Winegrad , Philadelphia, for petitioner.

Ryan T. McNicholas , Paoli, for respondent A. Duie Pyle.

BEFORE: McGINLEY, Judge, and COHN JUBELIRER, Judge, and FRIEDMAN, Senior Judge.

OPINION BY Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Hakif Namani (Claimant) petitions for review of an Order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed a Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) decision denying Claimant's Claim Petition, Reinstatement Petition, and Review Petition (jointly, Petitions). Claimant argues that his medical expert's testimony, along with other evidence, was sufficient to warrant a reinstatement of his benefits and/or a modification of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases