1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 29 A.3d
  5. 29 A.3d 9 (2011)
 

WIGGINS v. SYNTHES (U.S.A.)

No. 2887 EDA 2010.

29 A.3d 9 (2011)

2011 PA Super 172

Rhonda WIGGINS and James Van Rooyen, III v. SYNTHES (U.S.A.), Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed August 12, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey C. Lord and Mary Ann Mullaney , Philadelphia, for appellant.

Gustine J. Pelagatti, III , Philadelphia and Stewart J. Greenleaf, Jr. , Blue Bell, for appellees.

BEFORE: BOWES, ALLEN, and FREEDBERG, JJ.

OPINION BY FREEDBERG, J.:

Appellant, Synthes (U.S.A.), appeals from the judgment entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas in favor of Appellee, James Van Rooyen, III.1 Appellant contends that Appellee failed to establish a products liability claim under the malfunction theory. Specifically, it maintains that Appellee's expert testimony was insufficient to establish each element of the claim. Finding no reversible error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases