POPOWSKY v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N

No. 715 C.D. 2010.

13 A.3d 583 (2011)

Irwin A. POPOWSKY, Consumer Advocate, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 21, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane E. Dusman , Senior Assistant Consumer Advocate, Harrisburg, for petitioner.

Thomas T. Niesen , Harrisburg, for intervenor The Newtown Artesian Water Company.

Heidi L. Wushinske , Assistant Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: McGINLEY, Judge, BROBSON, Judge, and QUIGLEY, Senior Judge.


OPINION BY Judge BROBSON.

The Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), dated April 15, 2010. The PUC authorized Newtown Artesian Water Company (NAWC) to supplement its tariff for water service with an automatic rate adjustment mechanism to recover increases in purchased water expense, referred to as a "Purchased Water Adjustment Clause" (PWAC). The principal issue in this case is whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases