1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 988 A.2d
  5. 988 A.2d 1289 (2010)
 

SPENCER v. SPENCER

No. 184 EM 2009.

988 A.2d 1289 (2010)

Robert S. SPENCER and Kenmere Partners, Respondents v. Craig A. SPENCER, the Arden Group, Inc., Arden Encino, Inc., Arden Encino Partners, Ltd., Arden Penn Square Partners, L.P., Arden Penn Square Partners, Inc., Arden Walnut Partners, Inc., Arden Walnut Partners, L.P., Arden Vail Partners, L.L.C., Arden Landmark, L.L.C., and Arden Meridian Associates, L.P., Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

February 4, 2010.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2010, the Emergency Petition for Review of Superior Court's Denial of Stay Pending Appeal and Immediate Stay Pending Review are DENIED. The Motion for Leave to File Reply to Answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases