1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 989 A.2d
  5. 989 A.2d 69 (2010)
 

VALENTINE CO. v. COM.

No. 562 F.R. 2006.

989 A.2d 69 (2010)

VALENTINE COMPANY (f/k/a Nichols & Associates, Inc.), Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 15, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maura Fay McIlvain, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

John J. Butchar, Sr. Deputy Attorney General, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: LEADBETTER, President Judge, McGINLEY, Judge, PELLEGRINI, Judge, COHN JUBELIRER, Judge, SIMPSON, Judge, LEAVITT, Judge, and BUTLER, Judge.

OPINION BY President Judge LEADBETTER.

Valentine Company, Inc. (f/k/a Nichols & Associates, Inc.), a licensed surplus lines licensee for Temple University,1 has filed exceptions to this court's panel opinion and order, which affirmed as modified the Board of Finance and Revenue's denial of its petition for relief.2 In our initial opinion, we concluded that Temple University was not immune from the 3% surplus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases