1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 972 A.2d
  5. 972 A.2d 14 (2009)
 

CRUZ v. PRINCETON INS. CO.

No. 3191 EDA 2004, No. 3192 EDA 2004.

972 A.2d 14 (2009)

Jacqueline Nieves CRUZ and Oscar Cruz, Appellants v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, Alan S. Gold, Esquire and Gold, Butkovitz & Robins, P.C., Appellees.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed March 24, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne E. Pedersen, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Jeffrey B. McCarron, Philadelphia, for Gold, appellees.

Jonathan Bart, Philadelphia, for Princeton, appellee.

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J., STEVENS, MUSMANNO, ORIE MELVIN, LALLY-GREEN, TODD, BENDER, BOWES, and PANELLA, JJ.

OPINION BY BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 This matter comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania for consideration of whether plaintiffs Jacqueline Nieves Cruz and Oscar Cruz (the Cruzes) adduced evidence sufficient to raise a question of material fact concerning the harm element of their claim for Abuse of Process. The Cruzes argue, and we conclude, that the evidence, both direct and circumstantial, does raise such a question. Accordingly, we reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases