1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 970 A.2d
  5. 970 A.2d 1159 (2009)
 

TINDALL v. FRIEDMAN

Nos. 3390 EDA 2004, 3391 EDA 2004, 3433 EDA 2004, 3494 EDA 2005.

970 A.2d 1159 (2009)

Jeffrey TINDALL and Silvia Tindall, Husband and Wife, v. Brad S. FRIEDMAN, D.O., and Mark Schweitzer, M.D. and Jefferson Imaging and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Health System, Appeal of: Mark Schweitzer, M.D. Appellant. Jeffrey Tindall and Silvia Tindall, Husband and Wife, v. Brad S. Friedman, D.O., and Mark Schweitzer, M.D. and Jefferson Imaging and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Health System, Appeal of: Brad S. Friedman, D.O. Appellant. Jeffrey Tindall and Silvia Tindall, v. Brad S. Friedman, D.O., and Mark Schweitzer, M.D. and Jefferson Imaging Appeal of: Jefferson Imaging, Appellant. Jeffrey Tindall and Silvia Tindall, v. Brad S. Friedman, D.O., and Mark Schweitzer, M.D., and Jefferson Imaging and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Health System, Appellees.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed March 24, 2009.

Reargument Denied June 1, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Peel, Plymouth Meeting, for Schweitzer.

Edward M. Koch, Berwyn, for Jefferson.

James W. Gicking, Philadelphia, for Friedman.

David A. Yanoff, Philadelphia, for Tindall.

BEFORE: BOWES, SHOGAN and FITZGERALD, JJ.

OPINION BY BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 Dr. Brad S. Friedman, Dr. Mark Schweitzer, and Jefferson Imaging have filed separate appeals from the judgment entered on a jury award in favor of Jeffrey and Silvia Tindall, and the Tindalls have appealed the trial court's post-trial entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict ("n.o.v.") in favor of Jefferson Imaging. We reverse the entry of judgment n.o.v. in favor of Jefferson Imaging and remand for reinstatement of the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases