1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 537 P.3d
  5. 537 P.3d 584 (2023)
 

STATE v. JOSEPH

A174920.

537 P.3d 584 (2023)

328 Or. App. 363

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Claude Leonard JOSEPH III, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

September 27, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest G. Lannet , Chief Defender, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs was Mary Reese , Deputy Public Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services.

Jennifer S. Lloyd , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Pagán, Judge.

Can a discovery letter identifying potential witnesses and physical evidence, which was never intended to make known "the particulars" of how the prosecutor planned to introduce and rely on child hearsay statements during a jury trial, be construed as satisfying the requirements of OEC 803(18a)(b) when considered in context?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases