1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 526 P.3d
  5. 526 P.3d 1201 (2023)
 

COCKEY v. MEAD

A177424.

526 P.3d 1201 (2023)

324 Or. App. 526

Scott COCKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George MEAD, an individual and The Mead Law Firm, P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

March 8, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Whitman argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Julie A. Smith , Portland, argued the cause for respondents. Also on the brief was Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP.

Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, and Joyce, Judge, and Jacquot, Judge.

In this legal malpractice case, plaintiff appeals from a judgment granting summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that plaintiff's claim is time-barred.1 The question we must resolve is whether there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff knew or should have known of any harms...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases