OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY v. LOY CLARK PIPELINE

A171747.

514 P.3d 544 (2022)

320 Or. App. 205

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH DIVISION, Petitioner, v. LOY CLARK PIPELINE, CO., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

June 8, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erin K. Galli , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the briefs were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

James S. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were George W. Goodman and Cummins, Goodman, Denley & Vickers, P. C.

Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Pagán, Judge.


Petitioner, Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OR-OSHA) seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board (WCB) order, following a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), which concluded that OR-OSHA failed to establish a violation arising from an excavation in northwest Portland. OR-OSHA alleged that employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases